another publication by IMAGE asia

Hughes Krupica: Everybody loves good neighbours

  Boat Lagoon

I grew up as a teenager watching an Australian TV show featuring Kylie Minogue – Neighbours. It was a massively popular soap in the UK and simply dramatised very effectively the relationships between neighbours in
a fictional suburb of Melbourne.

When I was a trainee lawyer in the UK, I remember one visit to the law library of a very large law firm in which I was asked to research ‘neighbour disputes’. Amazingly for me, there was an entire section of that library devoted to a seemingly never-ending supply of disputes between neighbours.

Since then, looking at the world and global peace issues, it is apparent that neighbouring countries, north-south divides within countries, islands located in between Japan, Vietnam, China and the Philippines, temples considered by countries to belong to them and not the other neighbouring country all signify that neighbourly disputes are an issue in almost every aspect of many people’s lives.

In Phuket, neighbour disputes also pop up regularly. Some are created at the fault of one neighbour, some by multiple parties and some by developers who become neighbours to the buyers of real estate from them. There are cultural issues when families of different nationalities, religions and income brackets live next to each other or in the same estate.

Here are some common questions that pop up regarding neighbours, disputes and rights in Phuket to provide readers with a clue as to methods to avoid or deal with neighbour issues:

My neighbour has grown a fruit tree, which now hangs over the wall between our gardens. I don’t actually like eating the fruit, but my wife told me we could take some and sell it out of the back of a pick-up truck. Can we take the fruit hanging over the wall?

Not necessarily. You can cut overhanging branches, and you can collect fruit which falls onto your land. However, you can’t simply remove the fruit. Foreigners should be careful that, if they are leasing land (they naturally can’t own land), that they cannot exercise the same rights as their landlord might be able to.

Under Section 1347 of the Civil and Commercial Code (“CCC”): “The owner of a piece of land may cut off and keep roots of a tree or bush which have penetrated from the adjoining piece of land. He may also cut off and keep overhanging branches after giving the possessor of the adjoining piece of land reasonable notice to remove them, such notice not having been complied with.”

And further under Section 1348. “Fruits falling naturally upon adjoining land are presumed to be fruits of such land.”

We built a lovely modern European style house on a piece of land in a jungle area at the base of a mountain in Phuket five years ago. At the time, nobody lived on the bare land next to the property. However, a whole community has formed in recent years comprising tin-roofed temporary buildings, temporary electricity wires, a chicken and rooster enclosure, a carp lake which becomes mosquito-infested during wet season and what seems to be an informal karaoke bar. Our immediate neighbours built their roof at such a height and at such an angle that during the wet season the rain simply pours onto our expensive Japanese grass lawn and floods our garden. Is this legal?

No. Under the CCC Section 1341 “The owner of an immovable property must not construct roofs or other structures which cause rain water to fall upon the adjoining property.”

Please note however, that if you sue under this section or similar provisions of law, go through the Court of First Instance decision, pay the legal fees and expenses of trial, you may then have to face an appeal and further appeal against any decisions such that the costs of suing may far exceed the damages you suffer from the raindrops affecting your expensive Japanese grass lawn. You might be better off buying your neighbour some guttering and a present to keep the peace.

My wife bought some bare land next to the land plot on which our house is built. We didn’t erect a wall around the land as it is pretty clear from the natural boundaries of the land where the land begins and ends, as the land is also next to a public road. We went on holiday to Europe for four months during the wet season and, when we came back, there was a wooden hut dwelling on the bare land. We didn’t give permission for it to be there. Are we entitled to insist on the building being removed? There are young children in the building.

You must be mindful not to take any action which could cause harm to others. If the property is always inhabited, then you unfortunately will have to sue to enforce your rights in relation to the land.

Under Section 1311 CCC “If a person has, in bad faith, constructed a building upon another person's land, he must return the land after having put it in its former condition, unless the owner of the land chooses to have it returned in its present condition, in which case the owner of the land must pay at his option the price of the building or a sum representing the increased value of the land.”

I bought a house but thought I would save on unnecessary legal fees and proceed to buy without checking the neighbouring land to my property. I am pretty good with contracts as I read all terms and conditions that I ever encounter, including even mandatory terms and conditions and license agreements for computer software. However, it seems my cost-saving decision has backfired, as apparently between my property and the public road there is no right of access. Does this mean I cannot get to the public road or to my property without breaking the law?

Sometimes it can cost more in the long term by not obtaining legal advice before investing in property. This is what keeps the litigation departments of law firms busy. Many litigators are therefore perhaps in some ways thankful for such mistakes being made.

Now that you are aware of the mistake, the issue is how to resolve the defect with your property. In order to access your property and to get to the public road, you are entitled to traverse across neighbouring property but you must be careful not to trespass, not to damage another person’s property and not to disturb them. This will not make the issue convenient for you.

Under Section 1349 of the CCC “If a piece of land is so surrounded by other pieces of land that it has no access to the public ways, the owner may pass over the surrounding land to reach a public way.

The same applies, if passage can only be had over a pond, marsh, or sea, or if there is a steep slope with a considerable difference of level between the land and the public way.

The place and the manner of the passage must be chosen as to meet the needs of the person entitled to passage and at the same time to cause as little damage as possible to the surrounding land. The person entitled to passage may, if necessary, construct a road for passage.

The person entitled to passage must pay compensation for any damage suffered by the land owner on account of the passage being established. Such compensation, except for damages arising from the construction of a road, may be made by annual payments”

By Desmond Hughes, Senior Partner, Hughes Krupica
Hughes Krupica is a law firm which specialises in Real Estate; Construction; Hospitality; Corporate; Dispute Resolution; and Litigation, operating in Bangkok and Phuket, servicing clients in relation to their business activities in Thailand and in other regions of Asia. www.hugheskrupica.com

GPS coordinate: 7.962140, 98.385884

 Contact info:

Hughes Krupica Consulting

PHUKET (HEAD OFFICE)
Hughes Krupica Consulting Co. Ltd
23/123-5 Moo 2 Kohkaew Plaza
The Phuket Boat Lagoon
T. Kohkaew Amphoe Muang
Phuket 83000 Thailand
Tel: (0) 76 608 468

BANGKOK (SERVICED OFFICE)
Hughes Krupica Consulting (Bangkok) Co. Ltd
29/41 Soi Ladprao 22
Ladprao Road
Chankasem, Chatuchak
Bangkok 10900 Thailand
Tel: (0) 20 771 518

[email protected]
www.hugheskrupica.com

You also might like like from Hughes Krupica-Legal




Twitter